• Users Online: 572
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 1-9

Dosimetric comparison of two type's applicator geometry in the three-dimensional computed tomography image-based intracavitary brachytherapy treatment planning of carcinoma uterine cervix


1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
2 Department of Ratiotherapy, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India
3 Department of Radiotherapy, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India
4 Department of Ratiotherapy, Chirayu Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
5 Department of Physics, Government Degree College, Karera, Shivpuri, Madhya Pradesh, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Suresh Yadav
Department of Radiation Oncology, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jrcr.jrcr_71_20

Rights and Permissions

Background: The swift dose fall-off traits with distance from the applicators are the dominant advantage of brachytherapy. The differences in applicator designs will produce different dose distributions in intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) applications. Aim: The present study was aimed to find out the dosimetric differences for two type's applicators geometry in ICBT applications for carcinoma uterine cervix (Ca-Cx) performing three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) image-based planning as per recent guidelines from the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements report-89. Materials and Methods: Retrospectively, 15 patients of Ca-Cx who have received ICBT treatment based on the 3D-CT image during 1st and 2nd fractions using fixed-geometry and flexible-geometry applicators respectively were selected for this study. For comparison of two type's applicators geometry the dose-volume parameters D100% and D90% of high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), V400%, V200%, V150%, V100%, V50% (volume enclosing 400%, 200%, 150%, 100%, and 50% isodoseline of prescribed dose around target, respectively), and average point “A” dose were evaluated for target. While for organs at risk (bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon) the dose-volume parameters D2cc, D1cc, and D0.1cc were recorded and evaluated. Results: Fixed-geometry applicator produces significantly lesser HR-CTV volume (P = 0.016 <0.05) but delivered significantly 10.88% higher D90 mean doses (P = 0.031 <0.05) in comparison to flexible-geometry applicator. The flexible-geometry applicator created significantly higher central dose-volume structures around the target at the cost of significantly 15.89%, 17.04%, and 18.88% higher mean doses for rectum D2cc, D1cc, and D0.1cc, respectively, insignificant higher bladder dose, but lower sigmoid colon doses. Conclusion: The results of this study will be helpful to clinicians to select appropriate/suitable geometry applicator according to the patient's anatomical structure in brachytherapy treatment of Ca-Cx for better clinical outcome.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed857    
    Printed23    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded111    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal